Archive for the ‘Florida happenings’ Category

Read this article and remember the key here is illegal immigrants, ILLEGAL!

Thursday, November 3rd, 2011

Children of Illegal Immigrants Sue Florida Over State’s College Tuition Policy

MIAMI, Fla. (CBS Tampa) – Children of illegal immigrants living in Florida are suing the state for charging them out-of-state tuition.

Wendy Ruiz, a sophomore at Miami Dade College, is one of those behind the lawsuit.

She is paying $5,000 more than she technically has to, because her college insisted upon charging her out-of-state tuition when her parents were unable to produce legal immigration documents.

Ruiz was born in the United States, and has lived in Florida her entire life. As such, she is both an American and Florida citizen in the eyes of the law.

“It’s so unfair,” she told CBS Tampa. “I was born here. This makes no sense.”

Rather than keeping quiet, Ruiz chose to take action. She and five other college-age Floridians are now involved in a class-action lawsuit that seeks to overturn the rule.

Miriam Haskell of the Southern Poverty Law Center is working on the case.

“We believe strongly that young people … should be treated equally, and have a right to access education,” Haskell stated to CBS Tampa. “(This policy) is deterring not just Wendy and the four other plaintiffs, but scores of others in Florida.”

Gerard Robinson, the Florida Commissioner of Education, and Frank T. Brogan, the Chancellor of the State University System, are listed as the defendants in this case.

When CBS Tampa called the Florida Department of Education, the press office said they could not comment on pending litigation.

Haskell said that the case has been filed in federal court.

“This policy violates the federal constitution. This is not a state statute,” she said. “It violates the equal protection clause, which guarantees equal rights for all United States citizens. The constitution doesn’t make exceptions based on who the parents are.”

In the meantime, Ruiz is doing her best to continue with her education despite the thousands of dollars she must now pay in tuition costs.

“I have financial aid … (but) the rest I pay out of pocket,” she said. “During the week I work at the school in administrative services, and on the weekends I tutor, I babysit … I’ve been a waiter, and had other jobs.”

To make time for her jobs, Ruiz said that she has assumed part-time student status, and is presently taking eight credits in the form of three courses.

Haskell noted that, though sometimes grueling, Ruiz is still fortunate.

“Some are able to make ends meet. Some try to do later education, or take a longer time with their education,” she said. “But hundreds are completely deterred from going at all. Three of the plaintiffs (in this case) are unable to attend at all.”

The hope is to resolve the issue and see this rule reversed before it reaches trial.

“We’ve reached out to them, and given them the opportunity to talk with us before moving forward,” Haskell said. “(They have not done so) yet, but it hasn’t been too long.”

According to NPR, State Rep. Reggie Fullwood (D-15) has introduced legislation that would grant access to in-state tuition rates to qualifying citizens, regardless of the immigration status of his or her parents.

“You know I would be extremely happy if we didn’t have to push this legislation, if there was some policy fix or some administrative fix that could be done,” Fullwood told NPR. “I would be one of the happiest people around.”

Ruiz is optimistic that the situation will resolve itself in a way that allows for more affordable opportunities for her and others in her situation. Until then, she’s not backing down.

“This is not stopping me from coming to school. I want to have a bright future ahead of me,” she said. “This (situation) is making me strong and more independent, and more willing to speak my voice.”

Added Ruiz, “It makes me more determined to what I want to become.”

Very interesting responses to my Request to OUR Congressional representatives in Washington from Florida.

Wednesday, October 12th, 2011

Very interesting responses to my Request to OUR Congressional representatives in Washington from Florida. The question wanted to know their position on the Internect and Federal Communications Commission rules.

From Rep Thomas J. Rooney:
Thank you for contacting me regarding net-neutrality. I appreciate your comments and this opportunity to address your concerns. You decide who is for freedom & who is for big government.

Since the Telecommunications Act of 1996 was passed into law, new technologies and advancements in telecommunications have surfaced. These developments occurred so rapidly that Congress recognized the need to update the law.

I want to be clear that I support a hands-off approach to the internet. I don’t believe in taxing the internet or regulating it. The internet has flourished beyond anyone’s imagination and I do not think Congress should be responsible for slowing it down. Please be assured that I will continue to protect an open and free internet that will allow it to grow and thrive.

Several proposals have been introduced in Congress that address telecommunications reform. Please know that as legislation develops I will be sure to keep your views in mind.

Again, thank you for contacting me with your concerns. I encourage you to visit my website at www.rooney.house.gov to sign up for my e-newsletter.
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Rooney
Member of Congress

Fron Sen. Bill Nelson:
Thank you for contacting me about consumers having unfettered access to the Internet.
On September 23, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) published rules to codify open Internet rules to ensure that consumers, businesses, and service providers continue to have equal access to the Internet. The rules are based on the four principles introduced by the FCC in 2005 and two additional rules to ensure nondiscrimination and transparency.
As a member of the Senate Commerce Committee, I have supported legislation that would put rules in place to ensure equal treatment of all Internet content and to protect the ability of consumers to access the lawful content of their choosing. I recently wrote to FCC Chairman Genachowski in support of protections to ensure an open and secure Internet and a thriving, competitive marketplace for consumers, producers, and service providers.
I appreciate your interest in this important issue, and I encourage you to visit the Federal website www.openinternet.gov where you can receive information about developments in this process and participate in the national dialogue about net neutrality. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Bill Nelson

We did not receive a response Fron Sen. Rubio.

Watch Sen Rubio clean the clock of Sen. John Kerry on the senate floor.

Monday, August 1st, 2011


During by far the most dramatic 24 hours of debt limit negotiations that have had a chokehold on American politics and government since January, Sen.Marco Rubio’s remarks followed by debate with Sen. John Kerry on the Senate floor this afternoon perhaps no better captures the frustration of freshman Republicans, hypocrisy of current political rhetoric, and inability of opposing sides to form real solutions.

Connie Mack has an interesting budget solution. What do you think?

Wednesday, July 27th, 2011

Connie Mack has an interesting budget solution.

WASHINGTON, July 13, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Congressman Mack today welcomed the support of Tea Party Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) as he signed on to the “One Percent Spending Reduction Act,” legislation – also known as the “Penny Plan” – that was introduced by Senator Mike Enzi (R-WY) last week, and authored by Congressman Connie Mack (R-FL) last spring in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Mack stated: “The support for the Penny Plan is growing almost daily on both sides of Capitol Hill as we draw closer to President Obama’s August 2 deadline to raise the debt ceiling and continue Washington’s reckless spending. Senator Paul’s election last year was another clear example of the voters saying ‘enough is enough’ with the way Washington spends their money and having Senator Paul’s support for the Penny Plan should send say to those voters, ‘We heard you loud and clear.’”

Presently the Mack Penny plan enjoys the support of over 40 co-sponsors in the U.S. House, the backing of the Republican Study Committee’s 103 Members, and two key U.S. Senators.

The Penny Plan balances the budget by:
– Cutting total federal spending by one percent each year for six
consecutive years,
– Setting an overall spending cap of 18 percent of gross domestic
product in 2018, and
– Reducing overall spending by $7.5 trillion over 10 years.

If Congress and the President are unable to make the necessary cuts, the bill’s fail-safe triggers automatic, across-the-board cuts to ensure the one percent reductions are achieved.

Last week Senator Enzi stated: “This proposal is simple, effective and real. That’s a winning combination that I hope my colleagues can get behind. If they can’t, I hope the people who elect them will.”

Mack added, “At President Obama’s news conference last week, he talked about hard-working American families having to make tough budget decisions at home – so is it too much to ask the federal government to do the same and eliminate one penny out of every federal dollar spent?”

Senior Citizens Need to wake up and see the Social Security Checks..

Friday, July 15th, 2011

U.S. gives billions of dollars in foreign aid to world’s richest countries – then asks to borrow it.The U.S. is providing hundreds of millions of dollars of U.S. gives billions of dollars in foreign aid to world’s richest countries – then asks to borrow it.

The U.S. is providing hundreds of millions of dollars of foreign aid to some of the world’s richest countries - while at the same time borrowing billions back, according to report seen by Congress.
The Congressional Research Service released the report last month which shows that in 2010 the U.S. handed out a total of $1.4bn to 16 foreign countries that held at least $10bn in Treasury securities.

Four countries in the world’s top 10 richest received foreign aid last year with China receiving $27.2m, India $126.6m, Brazil $25m, and Russia $71.5m.

Mexico also received $316.7m and Egypt $255.7m.

And yet despite the massive outgoings in foreign aid, the receiving countries hold trillions of dollars in U.S. Treasury bonds.

China is the largest holder with $1.1trillion as of March, according to the Treasury Department.

Brazil held $193.5bn, Russia $127.8bn, India $39.8bn, Mexico $28.1bn and Egypt had $15.3bn.

Foreign aid is earmarked for causes including HIV/AIDs prevention, combating weapons of mass destruction, fighting tuberculosis, and counter-terrorism efforts.

The news has caused grave concern, with Senator Tom Coburn, R-Okla, who requested the report seen by Fox News, calling the policy ‘dangerous’.

‘If countries can afford to buy our debt, perhaps they can afford to fund assistance programs on their own.

THE TOP 10 COUNTRIES RECEIVING THE MOST AID

Colombia $461.2m

Mexico $316.7m

Egypt $255.7m

Philippines $128.2m

India $126.6m

Russia $71.5m

China $27.2m

Brazil $25m

Thailand $16.75m

Turkey $8.2m

‘At the same time, when we borrow from countries we are supposedly helping to develop, we put off hard budget choices here at home.

The news arrives as lawmakers in Washington battle over the conditions for increasing the nation’s ability to borrow money before defaulting on its obligations.

The government reached its $14.3trillion borrowing limit last month and both parties agree that spending cuts are needed, although Republicans refuse to raise taxes that Democrats insist on.

President Obama has met with both sides over the issue, but no progress has been made. The State Department did not comment.
to some of the world’s richest countries – while at the same time borrowing billions back, according to report seen by Congress.
The Congressional Research Service released the report last month which shows that in 2010 the U.S. handed out a total of $1.4bn to 16 foreign countries that held at least $10bn in Treasury securities.

The government reached its $14.3trillion borrowing limit last month and both parties agree that spending cuts are needed, although Republicans refuse to raise taxes that Democrats insist on.

President Obama has met with both sides over the issue, but no progress has been made. The State Department did not comment.

Rubio: Every Aspect Of Life In America Is Worse Since Obama Took Over

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

Rubio: Every Aspect Of Life In America Is Worse Since Obama Took Over

http://tiny.cc/ikl5t

Rubio is right on the money and needs the support of the Florida people.

Obama & The Left’s Not-So-Hidden Agenda

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

Social Justice: Obama & The Left’s Not-So-Hidden Agenda Posted by Lloyd Marcus on July 12, 2011 at 9:55pm

I consulted my Thesaurus because I thought I have been over working the word “despicable” in my articles. However, my research confirmed the word best describes what passes for the modern civil rights movement and Obama administration.

I watched a video in which Al Sharpton concluded MLK fought for social justice. He mischaracterized Dr King’s dream saying it was to make everything equal in everybody’s house. Sharpton said MLK did not fight simply to put one black family in the White House. http://bit.ly/pUWQU6

MLK was a Republican. And yet, Al Sharpton addressed a congregation of ill-informed blacks, lying to them about MLK’s mission. Sharpton thrives on keeping racial tension, suspicion and hate alive.

To maintain relevance and his cherished seat of power at the Democratic Party round table, Sharpton must continue to deliver a mind numb monolithic black vote; proving himself to be an asset to the furtherance of their social justice agenda. Thus, Sharpton’s hatred of successful conservative blacks such as I. We threaten his gig.

Ironically, Sharpton is guilty of betraying his race, the very crime of which he accuses black conservatives. Imagine the cruelty of not only allowing a person to believe, but reinforcing the lie that the individual is a pauper, all the while seeing a thousand dollar bill in the hopeless person’s back pocket unknown to him or her.

This is what Sharpton does to black America when he preaches that they are not equal, while in realty, they are extraordinarily blessed to live in the greatest land of opportunity on the planet for ALL who choose to go for it. Despicable!

Then, there is former Obama administration Green Jobs Adviser Van Jones. Jones is another strong advocate for social justice. Incredibly, this man truly believes fairness is government making everyone’s life equal. http://bit.ly/hG5TCR

Jones was forced to resign when Glenn Beck and others raised heck. However, Obama would not have appointed the anti-traditional America radical socialist in the first place unless he agreed with Jones. My fellow Americans, we’re in deep trouble.
Patriots, the concept of social justice (government making everyone’s life equal) is insane, absurd and evil. It completely nullifies the human spirit, ambition, freedom to be all one can be and American Exceptionalism; all the things which have made America great.

In typical mindless “make himself feel good” fashion, a lib once told me, “Everyone deserves to live in a mansion”. While sounding compassionate, his statement is idiotic.

When I was 9 years old, my family moved into a brand new government funded housing project; an eleven story building. As per my recollection, most residents trashed the building. Only a hand full displayed gratitude, pride of ownership and respect for their homes. Poverty minded “gimme” parasites would turn a mansion into a ghetto.

As I said, the concept of social justice, government attempting to manufacture equal overcomes, is totally un-American and just plain nuts. And yet, this is obviously Obama’s agenda.

And, what does the first black president do to begin implementing his social justice utopia? The thug who thinks he is king divisively, irresponsibly and mercilessly drags all opposition out into the public square and brands them racist. Despicable!

Please take a moment to comprehend the extreme consequence of Obama’s promise to “fundamentally transform America”. Think of the unmitigated gall and arrogance in his statement.

Who the heck is Obama to change the vision of our Founding Fathers and shred our Constitution which has made us the most powerful, successful and altruistic nation on the planet in only 235 years. How dare Obama conclude America needs a fundamental transformation. Patriots, where is the outrage?

No one has asked, “Mr president, you vowed to fundamentally transform America. But, into what?”

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Vice Chair, www.CampaignToDefeatObama.com

We have a President that spends money to get into a civil war in Libya but THREATENS our SENIORS with lost checks

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

Rep. Tom Rooney is doing his job. WHY would the house not defund the Obama war. Why don’t they do it NOW!
We have a President that spends money to get into a civil war in Libya but THREATENs our SENIORS with lost checks.

House Votes Down Effort to Limit Libya Funding
By Jessica Brady
June 24, 2011,
President Barack Obama might have gotten the best outcome he could hope for from the House when the chamber refused to approve of U.S. involvement in Libya but stopped short of voting to limit funding for the operation.
A measure from Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) to restrict funding for military efforts in Libya was defeated, 180-238. That vote came just hours after the chamber rejected a resolution that would authorize military involvement in Libya for the next year.
It is time to stop funding The Obama WAR. It is time to cut off ALL foreign aid for the next 6 months. The HOUSE should start doing their job and make the Senate and President do their jobs. Lets see who is working for the people and who is working for the government

Marco Rubio, WE Need New Taxpayers, Not New Taxes.

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

New Taxpayers, Not New Taxes

Senator Marco Rubio

There is broad consensus in Washington that a “balanced approach” between spending cuts, controls, and increased revenue is the only possible way to reduce our $14.3 trillion national debt and avert a Greek-style debt crisis. I share this perspective.

As the ongoing debt negotiations advance, members of Congress should evaluate the components of a debt package through one question: Will this make it harder or easier for the American people to create jobs? For my part, I have never met a job creator in Florida that has told me they are waiting for Congress to pass another tax hike before they start growing their business.

Unfortunately, there are indications some are willing to accept that higher revenues in a debt package should come from a $1 trillion tax hike, even at a time when the unemployment rate is 9.2 percent and 25 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed. I vehemently disagree with this approach and will oppose a net tax increase on the economy that makes its way into a debt reduction deal.

To be clear, new revenues are an essential component of any viable debt reduction deal. We can’t simply cut our way out of this debt; we also need to grow our way out of it. The best way to do this is by increasing the number of taxpayers gainfully employed in our economy and by easing burdensome regulations, not by raising taxes.

We can generate lasting economic growth and trillions in new revenues for the federal government through pro-growth tax reform. Sen. Pat Toomey has a budget proposal that lowers top marginal tax rates to 25 percent in a revenue-neutral way and eliminates loopholes and deductions, resulting in $1.5 trillion of additional real growth over the next decade and millions of new private-sector jobs, according to the Heritage Foundation. His budget recognizes that tax cuts and an overhaul of our 70,000 page tax code will create jobs and generate trillions in new revenue.

Net tax increases are poor economic policy. Will raising taxes on manufacturers make it easier for them to hire new workers? Will raising taxes on American energy companies make it easier to create jobs? Will raising taxes on the businesses that Democrats refer to as “millionaires and billionaires” allow those businesses to expand? Across the board, the answer is “no.” Instead, these tax increases will kill jobs in every district, state, and industry in the country. Regardless of the rhetoric coming from Washington politicians, these taxes will also have a mathematically insignificant effect on deficit reduction.

I proudly support a “balanced approach” in the context of debt reduction that grows the economy and boosts tax revenues in the process. But when presented with the option of choking our weak economy with yet another net tax increase, I will oppose it. Our country needs new taxpayers, not new taxes.

Marco expanded on these ideas in an op-ed titled “New Taxpayers, Not New Taxes”

Monday, July 11th, 2011

“We Don’t Need New Taxes. We Need New Taxpayers.”
On Wednesday, Marco joined Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) to speak on the Senate floor about jobs and the debt. In his remarks, Marco stressed the importance of taking bad job-destroying ideas off the table in ongoing debt reduction negotiations. Watch their full joint speech here. “Here’s the bottom line: These tax increases they’re talking about, these so-called revenue enhancers, they don’t solve the problem,” Rubio said. “Here is what I suggest works in a balanced approach, using the President’s terminology. Let’s stop talking about new taxes and start talking about creating new taxpayers, which basically means jobs.”

Marco expanded on these ideas in an op-ed titled “New Taxpayers, Not New Taxes” for National Review Online.

“As the ongoing debt negotiations advance, members of Congress should evaluate the components of a debt package through one question: Will this make it harder or easier for the American people to create jobs? … when presented with the option of choking our weak economy with yet another net tax increase, I will oppose it. Our country needs new taxpayers, not new taxes.”