Archive for the ‘Politics Happening Internationally’ Category

GOP Divided Over Obama’s Jimmy Carter Moment Response to Egypt.

Friday, February 4th, 2011

By Liz Sidoti

AP WASHINGTON — As chaos roils Egypt, Republican lawmakers and the GOP’s potential presidential candidates are divided over President Barack Obama’s response though united in concern that an Islamic regime could rise to power in a nation that is an important U.S. ally in the precarious Middle East.

Compared with recent verbal sparring on domestic issues, the debate between Democrats and Republicans on Egypt is somewhat muted. That’s perhaps because the two parties differ little over U.S. policy toward Egypt. Both view the country as a linchpin to a peaceful Middle East. And while supportive of democracy there, both also express concern about the influence of extremists in a post-Mubarak government, a particular worry of Israel.

Trying to set the tone for their party, House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, the country’s two top elected Republicans, have deferred to the Democratic president. They are signaling an unwillingness among the GOP leadership in Congress to pick a fight, in line, at least on this issue, with the tradition that politics stops at the waters’ edge in the midst of foreign crises.

“America ought to speak with one voice,” said McConnell.

Even so, the party’s potential presidential hopefuls have taken a range of different tacks – some more confrontational – on a crisis that could dramatically alter U.S. foreign policy beyond Obama’s administration.

Related Stories
US Warns of Violence to Come in Egypt
Gangs Attack Foreigners in Egypt’s Growing Mayhem
What Can US Do if Mubarak Won’t Leave Egypt?
Lara Logan Detained By Police in Egypt as Journalist Woes Continue
Kenneth Cole’s Egypt Tweet Offends Just About Everyone on Twitter
Egyptian Protesters Vow They Will Remain: ‘We Lost Our Fear’
Hosni Mubarak Tells Amanpour Egypt Would Fall Apart if He Left Now
Greg Palkot and Olaf Wiig, Fox News Journalists, ‘Severely Beaten’ During Egypt Protests
Out of Egypt: Escaped Would-Be Bomber Is Home in Gaza
As Cairo Violence Deepens, Egyptian Official Apologizes for Attacks on Protesters
Some, led by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, are assailing Obama as they try to draw a sharp line with the Democrat on what could end be a major issue in his 2012 re-election campaign. But the critics have given few – if any – hints about what they would do differently.

Gingrich says of the Obama administration, “I don’t think they have a clue,” comparing the incumbents to the White under President Jimmy Carter following the collapse of Iran’s government. “It’s very frightening to watch this administration.”

But others, including the often-vocal Sarah Palin, have been silent. And a few, like former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, are treading carefully as each day of demonstrations in Egypt brings more turmoil.

At the same time, Obama’s rival from 2008, Sen. John McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, went further than the administration in pointedly calling for Mubarak to transfer power to a caretaker government immediately. He also expressed concerns about “the influence of extremist organizations” and the Muslim Brotherhood rising to power. And, one day after meeting with Obama in the Oval Office on a range of issues, McCain also said the U.S. “must do a better job of encouraging democracy” in the Middle East.

The overall generally subdued GOP reaction could change, however. Republicans are watching how Obama handles the crisis and are likely to pounce if uncertainty in Egypt lingers, raising worries about Israel’s security and the fate of the 1979 Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty. In that sense, Gingrich’s remarks may signal the first salvo of criticism.

Until now, foreign affairs has taken a backseat to domestic issues – most notably stubbornly high unemployment – throughout Obama’s administration and during last fall’s midterm elections in which the GOP rose to power in the House and gained seats in the Senate. Even as Obama has overseen two wars and pushes for a Middle East peace accord, Republicans have largely ceded foreign policy ground to him on Iraq and Afghanistan.

Iraq, to be sure, was a campaign issue in 2008. But, so far, Afghanistan has not emerged as a divisive partisan subject because Republicans largely agree with what Obama has done there. Whether Afghanistan becomes a hot issue in 2012 may depend on what Obama does between now and then in terms of reducing troop strength.

Instead of fighting over foreign policy, the GOP spent the better part of two years challenging Obama on his stateside policies. Republicans embraced topics where the ideological contrasts in governing between Democrats and the GOP were stark.

But over the past week, the crisis in Egypt pushed America’s foreign policy to the forefront. That, as well as the attempted assassination of an Arizona congresswoman last month, overshadowed partisan debates that the GOP was itching to have on the country’s rising debt and Obama’s new health care law.

The shift comes just as Republican presidential hopefuls are weighing whether they have the chops to take on Obama and seeking to bolster their foreign policy credentials with visits to the Middle East.

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour is heading to Israel this weekend on the heels of a trip by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

While there, Huckabee suggested Obama was being reckless toward Israel by nudging Mubarak to cede power, saying: “The United States’ deafening silence toward not even acknowledging any role that he may have played in a peaceful border between Egypt and Israel is what’s of great concern.”

Back stateside, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum called the Obama administration “clueless,” and former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty said it appeared to be “caught off guard and surprised and confused.”

Daniel Ortega’s defense-bill package would be a “Christmas present” to the military.

Tuesday, January 4th, 2011

MANAGUA, Nicaragua – A controversial defense-bill package submitted to the National Assembly by President Daniel Ortega this week represents a dangerous step towards consolidating a totalitarian government in Nicaragua, opposition analysts warn.

Taking advantage of the recent surge of Nicaraguan patriotism in response to the border conflict with Costa Rica, Ortega presented congress this week with three bills – The Law of National Defense, the Law of National Security and the Border Law – for “urgent approval” without debate.

Opposition lawmakers were able to delay the vote until Dec. 6, giving them the weekend to analyze the three bills and propose any modifications. But Sandinista lawmakers and their legislative allies insist they have the votes to approve the bills next week, before National Assembly breaks for year-end recess Dec. 15.

According to some military analysts, the proposed laws would essentially heavily militarize the government’s administration of the borders, implement new measures of social control in the name of national security, and grant the army unrestrained martial-law authority in times of “national emergency.”

“This is Ortega’s Christmas present to the army,” said retired Gen. Hugo Torres, who headed the military’s intelligence department in the 1990s. “The bills give the army too much power, more than normal.”

Torres, a former Sandinista guerrilla hero who has become increasingly critical of Ortega, said he views the defense bills as an attempt by the president to make the Nicaraguan Army – considered the strongest and most independent institution in Nicaragua – “indentify more closely with his personal political project.”

In addition, Torres warns, the bills’ vague yet ominous wording also opens the possibility of reestablishing the Sandinista government’s most repressive policies from the 1980s: forced military recruitment, property confiscations and domestic spying.

“Ortega is advancing in his dictatorial project under the old system,” Torres told The Nica Times this week. “He didn’t learn a thing from the 1980s.”

Necessary Laws?

Sandinista lawmakers deny that the laws would be used to re-implement obligatory military service – banned by the 1996 Constitution – or be used in any way as a repressive measure.

Edwin Castro, head of the Sandinistas’ legislative voting bloc, said that the true spirit of the legal initiative is “to combat narco-trafficking and organized crime.”

“At no moment is there any intention to violate the Constitution, which prohibits military recruitment, or violate fundamental rights,” Castro told reporters. “These laws have been drafted with a maximum respect for (the principle of military) subordination to civil authority.”

He said the approval of the three bills will, “Demonstrate legislative support for our national sovereignty, [protection of] our San Juan River and our territorial integrity.”

Military analysts agree that that legislation is needed to clearly articulate Nicaragua’s state policies regarding defense, security and sovereignty. But they question why Ortega wants to rush the legislation through National Assembly with such urgency.

In 2005, after a yearlong process of consultation and study, the Nicaraguan Army published its National Defense Manual (“Libro Blanco”) outlining defense policies and calling for the state to elaborate a National Defense Law (NT, June 17, 2005).

Five and a half years later, the Sandinista government finally drafted the law but wants it approved immediately without first going to commission for analysis, as is the normal legislative procedure. That sudden urgency is raising eyebrows.

“These are fundamental laws dealing with national security and the border; they have to be discussed and analyzed,” said opposition lawmaker Victor Hugo Tinoco, head of the minority Sandinista Renovation Movement (MRS).

Good Bills, But…

For civilian defense expert Roberto Cajina, former president of the Latin American Network on Security and Defense and a former military advisor to President Ortega’s brother, retired Gen. Humberto Ortega, the three proposed laws are not necessarily worrisome in how they are written.

In fact, Cajina said, they are important pieces of legislation that “should have been passed five years ago.”

However, the analyst warned, the problem could come later in President Ortega’s interpretation of the laws.

According to Nicaraguan law, the National Assembly passes legislation that is then regulated by the president. The problem with the defense bills, notes Cajina, is that they are vaguely worded and do not define specific treats to national security, or specify situations would justify a declaration of “national emergency.”

That leaves a lot open to Ortega’s interpretation. And for a president who is constantly warning about the threats of foreign agitators, coup plotters and other “enemies of the revolution,” the new legislation could become a dangerous legislative tool, especially in an election year, critics warn (see separate story, Nica Times).

Claudia Pineda, director of the Institute of Public Policy Study and Strategy (IEEPP), told The Nica Times this week that there are lots of “questionable concepts” in the new bills, which if approved would give the president a “whole new institutional architecture for administration of public policies.”

Pineda worries about the militarization of public policies, especially in the rural frontier areas where the army would essentially become the main government authority.

“When you are trying to build an institutional democracy, it’s not convenient to give the military strong influence over civilian rule,” she said. “That’s not healthy for democracy.”

Confiscations, Too?

Opposition lawmaker José Pallaís, president of the National Assembly’s Judicial Affairs Commission and a leader in the Liberal Constitutional Party (PLC), claims that the proposed Border Law could also be considered “confiscatory” and poses a serious threat to private-property rights.

He said a measure in the bill that would designate all land within 15 kilometers of borders “national territory” could provide Ortega with legal pretext to confiscate land, restrict its use, or force owners to sell.

“This could be used to appropriate land,” Pallaís told The Nica Times.

The wording of the controversial article reads, “An area of national terrain, which will extend from the border 15 kilometers toward the interior of the country, requires special treatment for the protection of the environment, culture and socio-economic development due to its geographic location and closeness to neighboring states.”

The article says that tourism developments approved by the Nicaraguan Tourism Institute (INTUR) will be included in the new territorial designation.

Pallaís noted that while other countries have land-use restrictions along the border, he said 15 kilometers is a “disproportionately” large amount of land.

The lawmaker said the bill could be interpreted as an effort to establish the legal foundation needed to appropriate land around the San Juan River for whatever project the government might be secretly planning in the zone.

In addition, Pallaís said, the package of bills sends a very bellicose message to Costa Rica and the international community.

“These bills give the impression that Ortega is preparing for war,” Pallaís said. “Instead of creating the image of a civil country, these initiatives give the image of a warmongering country. This is very dangerous.”

Australia says NO – Second Time she has done this!

Friday, December 31st, 2010

This should make you VERY sick to your stomach when you think of our weak failed President Obama. To bad he doesn’t have the balls of Prime Minister Julia Gillard – Australia.

Australia says NO – Second Time she has done this!

She’s done it again..
She sure isn’t backing down on her hard line stance and one has to appreciate her belief in the rights of her native countrymen..
A breath of fresh air to see someone lead. I wish some leaders would step up in Canada & USA ..

Australian Prime Minister does it again!!
This woman should be appointed Queen of the World.. Truer words have never been spoken.

It took a lot of courage for this woman to speak what she had to say for the world to hear. The retribution could be phenomenal, but at least she was willing to take a stand on her and Australia’s beliefs.
The whole world needs a leader like this!
Prime Minister Julia Gillard – Australia
She’s done it again..

Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia , as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks..

Separately, Gillard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying she supported spy agencies monitoring the nation’s mosques. Quote:

‘IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT.. Take It Or Leave It.
I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians. ‘

‘This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.’

‘We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society . Learn the language!’

‘Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.’

‘We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.’

‘This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, ‘THE RIGHT TO LEAVE’.’
‘If you aren’t happy here then LEAVE. We didn’t force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.’

Is this the thinking of the Government elite that have put the U.S. in danger?

Monday, December 20th, 2010

Maybe we had a little impact with them,” New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson told CNN today, explaining how he’s been in Pyongyang trying to convince North Korean leaders that they’ll benefit from not attacking the South again. “I think they deserve credit for holding back.”
Why would any one think that North Korean leaders deserve credit for attacking another country for NO REASON!

What is Gov. Bill Richardson going to do next, thank muggers for not attacking more victims?

Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy.

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010

Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy
The following is an excerpt from Clinton’s remarks….

In addition to new funding, we’ve launched a new program that will be the centerpiece of our foreign policy, the Global Health Initiative, which commits us to spending $63 billion over six years to improve global health by investing in efforts to reduce maternal and child mortality, prevent millions of unintended pregnancies, and avert millions of new HIV infections, among other goals. This initiative will employ a new approach to fighting disease and promoting health.

You see, whenever the global elite want to launch another new eugenics operation, they announce it as a great “humanitarian program” that will save millions of lives. But their real goal is to control the population and prevent millions of lives from being born.

This was also reflected in Clinton’s remarks about the United Nations Population Fund. The United Nations Population Fund has been promoting abortion, forced sterilization and radical population control measures around the globe for decades, and Hillary Clinton was super excited to talk about how the U.S. government recently renewed funding for that organization….

This year, the United States renewed funding of reproductive healthcare through the United Nations Population Fund, and more funding is on the way. (Applause.) The U.S. Congress recently appropriated more than $648 million in foreign assistance to family planning and reproductive health programs worldwide. That’s the largest allocation in more than a decade – since we last had a Democratic president, I might add. (Applause.)

So what exactly is so bad about the United Nations Population Fund?

Not only does the United Nations Population Fund support and fund the forced abortion and infanticide of China’s “one child” program, they also promote abortion, forced sterilization and brutal eugenics programs throughout the developing world.

TSA on special security screening procedures for diplomats.

Saturday, December 11th, 2010

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said “We obviously are concerned about it,” What she meant to say is we care about the elite but the TSA can continue to treat American travelers as the scum they are.

Sharon Weinberger writes:
Meera Shankar, India’s ambassador to the United States, was singled out for secondary security screening on Sunday at Jackson-Evers International Airport in Mississippi. The pat-down, which some say may have been prompted because the ambassador was wearing a sari, provoked condemnation from India’s government.

The TSA, however, said that after looking into what took place, it found that no policies were violated.

Kimball also pointed out that the State Department in 2007 published a special notice from TSA on special security screening procedures for diplomats. The notice says that if diplomats are selected for secondary screening, they should present their credentials and they will be subject to “special procedures.” The notice doesn’t specify what those procedures are, however

Asked about the incident on Thursday at a press briefing, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the issue had not been raised to her by Indian government officials, but the incident would be reviewed. “We obviously are concerned about it,” she said.

Iran Placing Medium-Range Missiles in Venezuela; Can Reach the U.S.

Friday, December 10th, 2010

One would have to wonder what happened since Obama was elected to make small dictators feel so bold while the U.S. sat back and did nothing. The Obama has done nothing on foreign policy but weaken and endanger the U.S. while lowering the views of the U.S. by other nations. Iran Placing Medium-Range Missiles in Venezuela; Can Reach the U.S.

by Anna Mahjar-Barducci
December 8, 2010 at 5:00 am

Iran is planning to place medium-range missiles on Venezuelan soil, based on western information sources[1], according to an article in the German daily, Die Welt, of November 25, 2010. According to the article, an agreement between the two countries was signed during the last visit o Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to Tehran on October19, 2010. The previously undisclosed contract provides for the establishment of a jointly operated military base in Venezuela, and the joint development of ground-to-ground missiles.

At a moment when NATO members found an agreement, in the recent Lisbon summit (19-20 November 2010), to develop a Missile Defence capability to protect NATO’s populations and territories in Europe against ballistic missile attacks from the East (namely, Iran), Iran’s counter-move consists in establishing a strategic base in the South American continent – in the United States’s soft underbelly.

According to Die Welt, Venezuela has agreed to allow Iran to establish a military base manned by Iranian missile officers, soldiers of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Venezuelan missile officers. In addition, Iran has given permission for the missiles to be used in case of an “emergency”. In return, the agreement states that Venezuela can use these facilities for “national needs” – radically increasing the threat to neighbors like Colombia. The German daily claims that according to the agreement, Iranian Shahab 3 (range 1300-1500 km), Scud-B (285-330 km) and Scud-C (300, 500 and 700 km) will be deployed in the proposed base. It says that Iran also pledged to help Venezuela in rocket technology expertise, including intensive training of officers

Venezuela has also become the country through which Iran intends to bypass UN sanctions. Following a new round of UN sanctions against the Islamic Republic, for example, Russia decided not to sell five battalions of S-300PMU-1 air defence systems to Iran. These weapons, along with a number of other weapons, were part of a deal, signed in 2007, worth $800 million. Now that these weapons cannot be delivered to Iran, Russia is looking for new customers; according to the Russian press agency Novosti[2], it found one: Venezuela.

Novosti reports the words of Igor Korotchenko, head of a Moscow-based think tank on international arms trade, saying that if the S-300 deal with Venezuela goes through, Caracas should pay cash for the missiles, rather than take another loan from Russia. “The S-300 is a very good product and Venezuela should pay the full amount in cash, as the country’s budget has enough funds to cover the deal ,” Korotchenko said. Moscow has already provided Caracas with several loans to buy Russian-made weaponry, including a recent $2.2-mln loan on the purchase of 92 T-72M1M tanks, the Smerch multiple-launch rocket systems and other military equipment.

If Iran, therefore, cannot get the S-300 missiles directly from Russia, it can still have them through its proxy, Venezuela, and deploy them against its staunchest enemy, the U.S..

But that is not all. According to Reuters, Iran has developed a version of the Russian S-300 missile and will test-fire it soon, as declared by the official news agency IRNA, two months after Moscow cancelled the delivery to comply with United Nations sanctions[3]. Iran, in fact, has its own capabilities for constructing missiles that could carry atomic warheads. According to a study recently released by the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London, Iran is presently aiming to perfect the already existing solid-fuel, medium-range missile that can carry a nuke to hit regional targets, such as Israel[4]. If a missile base can be opened in Venezuela, many US cities will be able to be reached from there even with short-medium range missiles.

The situation that is unfolding in Venezuela has some resemblance to the Cuba crisis of 1962. At that time, Cuba was acting on behalf of the USSR; now Venezuela is acting on behalf of Iran. At present, the geopolitical situation is very different: the world is no longer ruled by two superpowers; new nations, often with questionable leaders and the ambition of acquiring global status, are appearing on the international scene. Their danger to the free world will be greater if the process of nuclear proliferation is not stopped. Among the nations that aspire to become world powers, Iran has certainly the best capabilities of posing a challenge to the West.

Back in the 1962, thanks to the stern stance adopted by the then Kennedy administration, the crisis was defused

Nowadays, however, we do not see the same firmness from the present administration. On the contrary, we see a lax attitude, both in language and in deeds, that results in extending hands when our adversaries have no intention of shaking hands with us. Iran is soon going to have a nuclear weapon, and there are no signs that UN sanctions will in any way deter the Ayatollah’s regime from completing its nuclear program. We know that Iran already has missiles that can carry an atomic warhead over Israel and over the Arabian Peninsula. Now we learn that Iran is planning to build a missile base close to the US borders. How longer do we have to wait before the Obama administration begins to understand threats?

Iran, Venezuela plan to build rival to Panama Canal.

Sunday, December 5th, 2010

While Obama ignores Central America we see enemies of the United States have not.

Iran, Venezuela plan to build rival to Panama Canal
Sources tell Haaretz that the recent Nicaragua-Costa Rica border incident was a trial balloon by the creators of a plan to build a new canal in Latin America.
By Shlomo Papirblat

The recent border dispute between Costa Rica and Nicaragua is a sign of an ambitious plan by Venezuela, Iran and Nicaragua to create a “Nicaragua Canal” linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans that would rival the existing Panama Canal.

Costa Rica says that last week Nicaraguan troops entered its territory along the San Juan River – the border between the two nations. Nicaragua had been conducting channel deepening work on the river when the incident occurred.

Sources in Latin America have told Haaretz that the border incident and the military pressure on Costa Rica, a country without an army, are the first step in a plan formulated by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega, with funding and assistance from Iran, to create a substitute for the strategically and economically important Panama Canal.

The plan has aroused concern in Washington, and the U.S. has started behind the scenes efforts to foil it.

Panama is a country with a distinctly pro-American orientation. Since its construction was completed in 1914, the Panama Canal has served as an irreplaceable link between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. More than 14,000 ships pass through the canal annually and recently the one millionth ship passed the canal since its opening.

In recent years, the amount goods passing through the canal in each direction totaled about 190 million tons. The transit fees paid by the ships and other canal-related activities account for 75 percent of the annual revenues of Panama’s economy. The Panamanian economy and Panamanian stability would be in real danger of collapse if another canal took away its monopoly on shipping between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

In recent years, the government of Ortega, a former Sandinista underground member, has tried to gain control of the San Juan River, which lies on the Nicaragua-Costa Rica border. Costa Rica brought the issue before the international court in The Hague, which after careful examination of historic maps, past agreements and terrain features, determined in July 2009 that the river belonged to Nicaragua, and that the border is located on the southern bank of the river. The court also ruled that Costa Rica had the right of free passage on the river.

However, the results of this ruling are not enough to allow for the implementation of the plan formulated by Venezuela and Nicaragua. In order to build a new canal linking the two oceans, they would also need to control the southern bank of the river and the point where the river meets the Atlantic Ocean.

Several weeks ago, Nicaraguan foreign ministry official informed Costa Rica of Nicaragua’s plans to do work to deepen the channel of the San Juan River in order to improve shipping on the waterway. Costa Rica did not oppose the plans, on the condition that the work did not harm the river or the bank on the Costa Rican side of the river.

The apparent engineering project was surprisingly placed under the supervision of Eden Pastora, better known as “Commandante Cero”, a hero of the former Sandinista underground. This was a hint that the work had more than a simple engineering purpose.

Two weeks ago, Pastora went to a farm of a Costa Rican citizen in the Calero Island area and told the farm owner that the area belonged to Nicaragua. The farm owner objected and subsequently farm workers were allegedly beaten and farm animals were allegedly killed. The farm owner called Costa Rican police who arrived and reported to their commanders that Nicaraguan troops had entered Costa Rican territory and raised a Nicaraguan flag.

Costa Rican President Laura Chinchilla last week called for a special session of the Organization of American States, located in Washington, but, after a day of talks, no resolution was reached. During the talks, Venezuela supported Nicaragua’s position while Panama strongly opposed it.

Chincilla announced on Wednesday that she plans to raise the issue before the United Nations Security Council and again demanded that Nicaraguan soldiers withdraw from Costa Rican territory.

Sources in Latin America consider these events, and the power demonstrated by Nicaragua, as a trial balloon by the creators of the “New Canal Plan” – Venezuela, Iran and Nicaragua. Western intelligence agencies are closely following the path of heavy machinery equipment to Nicaragua as well as the activities of Iranians in the Nicaraguan capital Managua.

A U.S. State Department official told Haaretz’s Washington correspondent Natasha Mozgovaya on Wednesday that the U.S. is not aware of any plans to build a new canal in Latin America.

In 2007, Chavez announced a plan to build a $350 million road connecting the two oceans and the Iranians have expressed an interest in constructing a port on the Atlantic Ocean. The U.S. did not express concern about either of those initiatives.

I think I saw this plot on the sci-fi channel.

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

Climate chief Christina Figueres warns future is at stake
Special to A.M. Costa Rica

With the future of humanity at stake, governments must continue building common ground to further progress on climate change, the new United Nations chief on the issue said in the latest round of international negotiations which kicked off in Bonn Monday.

“Whether we succumb to the storms of climate change or work together to reach the far shore is up to us to decide,” said Christiana Figueres. She is a Costa Rican and executive secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. She was invoking the journey made by Christopher Columbus more than five centuries ago.

May be Christina Figueres should read about the fraud and lies put out by the people who benefit from climate fraud. Enough is enough of the hysteria. The history of the earth shows there are continuous changes and man has had very little to nothing to do with these. We need to work to have clean air and clean water but enough of the foolish hysteria.

Join Americas Independent Movement on facebook.

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

http://www.facebook.com/pages/manage/#!/pages/Americas-Independent-Movement/139700267779