Posts Tagged ‘Marco Rubio’

Reid Accuses Rubio of Not Being Hispanic Enough

Monday, February 20th, 2012

Reid Accuses Rubio of Not Being Hispanic Enough

Once again, America should pause to thank the good people of Nevada for inflicting Harry Reid upon the nation. Today the Senate Majority Leader is under fire for attacking Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and suggesting that he’s insufficiently Hispanic.

The occasion of Reid’s remarks was Rubio’s opposition to President Obama’s choice for ambassador to El Salvador, Maria Carmen Aponte. Aponte was a recess appointment, made back when our unitary Executive still felt obliged to actually wait for Congress to recess before making such appointments. She was up for a confirmation vote this year, but Rubio voted against her.

One of his reasons for doing so was a desire to make the Administration condemn the Sandinista regime in Nicaragua for vote fraud. (Yes, the Sandinistas are back.) For some reason, the Obama crew had been reluctant to make the blindingly obvious observation that the Sandinistas rigged the recent elections. They did it the old-fashioned way, by using thugs to clear out opposition poll watchers, then stuffing an extra 150,000 votes into the ballot boxes. Ballots are the only thing communists are good at manufacturing.

Harry Reid, said it would be ‘foolish’ to pass a budget.

Saturday, January 28th, 2012

1,000 Days
Tuesday marked 1,000 days since Senate Democrats have passed a budget. The past three years have been a reckless spending spree that added $4.5 trillion in new debt to our tab and enabled our overall debt to surpass $15 trillion.

Rubio: “The Majority Leader in the Senate, Harry Reid, said it would be ‘foolish’ to pass a budget. I disagree. As we mark the 1,000th day since Senate Democrats have passed a budget – a fundamental element of governing – it is clear that those in Washington worrying more about their next reelection than making the tough choices to get our nation on a sustainable fiscal path are the ones being foolish.”

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) withdrew as a co-sponsor of the Protect IP Act in the Senate.

Friday, January 20th, 2012

Rubio, 2 Others Withdraw Support of Anti-piracy Bills

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) withdrew as a co-sponsor of the Protect IP Act in the Senate, and Reps. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) and Ben Quayle (R-Ariz.) said they were pulling their names from the companion House bill.

Rubio said on Facebook that after the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously passed its bill last year, he has “heard legitimate concerns about the impact the bill could have on access to the Internet and about a potentially unreasonable expansion of the federal government’s power to impact the Internet.”

“Congress should listen and avoid rushing through a bill that could have many unintended consequences,” Rubio said. With his withdrawal, the number of co-sponsors drops to 39.

Marco Rubio is the perfect Senator for the people of Florida.

Saturday, October 15th, 2011

Marco on President Obama’s Jobs Bill
On Tuesday, the Senate voted down S.1660, the American Jobs Act of 2011. Before the vote, Marco submitted a statement for the record explaining his opposition to the bill. Read an excerpt below and the full statement here .

“Since I joined the Senate nine months ago, I have maintained my strong belief that Democrats and Republicans should work together to pass policies proven to boost economic growth like pro-growth tax and regulatory reform, lowering barriers to free trade, and cutting spending to avert our looming debt crisis. Unfortunately, the huge tax increases on job creators and more debt-financed stimulus spending in the American Jobs Act would move our nation in squarely the wrong direction.”

After the vote, Marco released a video statement on the bill. Watch the video here .

Watch Sen Rubio clean the clock of Sen. John Kerry on the senate floor.

Monday, August 1st, 2011


During by far the most dramatic 24 hours of debt limit negotiations that have had a chokehold on American politics and government since January, Sen.Marco Rubio’s remarks followed by debate with Sen. John Kerry on the Senate floor this afternoon perhaps no better captures the frustration of freshman Republicans, hypocrisy of current political rhetoric, and inability of opposing sides to form real solutions.

Did Bill Nelson vote to work on solving the debt issue or vote to put SENIORS at risk of losing their checks?

Monday, July 25th, 2011

It is time for Florida seniors to ask why Bill Nelson is voting against SENIORS over and over again.
On the Motion to Table; Cut, Cap, and Balance Act of 2011 – Vote Agreed to (51-46, 3 Not Voting).

__Sen. Bill Nelson voted to approve the bill
__Sen. Bill Nelson voted to debate the bill and make changes to it
__Sen. Bill Nelson voted like a weasel to table or pretend the bill didn’t exist

In other words did Bill Nelson vote to work on solving the issue or vote to put SENIORS at risk of losing their checks?

Sen. Marco Rubio voted to do something about solving the problem.
In the House Rep. Tom Rooney voted to do something about the debt crisis also.

Ok, lets give the ANTI Senior citizen Sen. Nelson another look as may be that was just bad judgement.

How did Sen. Bill Nelson vote on the house budget passed months ago that would have delt with the debt crisis.

Oh he never voted on the budget because once again Bill Nelson and his anti Senior party refused to voted on the budget passed by the house and put seniors at risk. No debate, no counter offer, no budget as a response. But then the Democrats have been in control of the congress for 4 1/2 year and in control of the Presidency for 2 1/2 yrs. Bill Nelson and his party that was in complete and total control of the government never offered a budget as required by LAW.

WHY??????? Why Bill Nelson????

We are sure the workers at NASA wish Bill had given them the support they had given him.

Rubio Opposes McConnell / Obama Debt Plan

Monday, July 18th, 2011

Rubio Opposes McConnell Debt Plan
On Newsmax

Conservatives seem to be shying away from supporting Mitch McConnell’s debt plan, and rising GOP Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., is at the top of the list.

On Sunday he said strongly voiced his opposition to the plan on CBS’ ‘Face the Nation.’

“The way the deal is currently structured right now … it gives the president the ability to raise the debt limit, but as I’ve said already on the program, the debt limit’s not really the problem here. The problem is the debt,” Rubio said and The Hill reported.

Rubio worries the nation’s credit rating is at stake if the country does not make significant steps at reducing the deficit.

“I don’t believe this plan, as it’s been outlined to me, is a credible solution to our debt problem,” Rubio said.

Other conservatives voicing opposition include Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), one of the Senate’s most outspoken advocates for deficit reduction.

“I am only going to support something that actually solves the problem, and if we don’t solve the problem — and not the political problem,” he said on ‘Face the Nation.’ “If it doesn’t solve the policy problem for this country, I am not going to support it.”

Others joining their ranks include Sens. Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Mike Lee of Utah, as well as Sens. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, Rand Paul of Kentucky, and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin.

Rubio: Every Aspect Of Life In America Is Worse Since Obama Took Over

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

Rubio: Every Aspect Of Life In America Is Worse Since Obama Took Over

http://tiny.cc/ikl5t

Rubio is right on the money and needs the support of the Florida people.

Marco Rubio, WE Need New Taxpayers, Not New Taxes.

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

New Taxpayers, Not New Taxes

Senator Marco Rubio

There is broad consensus in Washington that a “balanced approach” between spending cuts, controls, and increased revenue is the only possible way to reduce our $14.3 trillion national debt and avert a Greek-style debt crisis. I share this perspective.

As the ongoing debt negotiations advance, members of Congress should evaluate the components of a debt package through one question: Will this make it harder or easier for the American people to create jobs? For my part, I have never met a job creator in Florida that has told me they are waiting for Congress to pass another tax hike before they start growing their business.

Unfortunately, there are indications some are willing to accept that higher revenues in a debt package should come from a $1 trillion tax hike, even at a time when the unemployment rate is 9.2 percent and 25 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed. I vehemently disagree with this approach and will oppose a net tax increase on the economy that makes its way into a debt reduction deal.

To be clear, new revenues are an essential component of any viable debt reduction deal. We can’t simply cut our way out of this debt; we also need to grow our way out of it. The best way to do this is by increasing the number of taxpayers gainfully employed in our economy and by easing burdensome regulations, not by raising taxes.

We can generate lasting economic growth and trillions in new revenues for the federal government through pro-growth tax reform. Sen. Pat Toomey has a budget proposal that lowers top marginal tax rates to 25 percent in a revenue-neutral way and eliminates loopholes and deductions, resulting in $1.5 trillion of additional real growth over the next decade and millions of new private-sector jobs, according to the Heritage Foundation. His budget recognizes that tax cuts and an overhaul of our 70,000 page tax code will create jobs and generate trillions in new revenue.

Net tax increases are poor economic policy. Will raising taxes on manufacturers make it easier for them to hire new workers? Will raising taxes on American energy companies make it easier to create jobs? Will raising taxes on the businesses that Democrats refer to as “millionaires and billionaires” allow those businesses to expand? Across the board, the answer is “no.” Instead, these tax increases will kill jobs in every district, state, and industry in the country. Regardless of the rhetoric coming from Washington politicians, these taxes will also have a mathematically insignificant effect on deficit reduction.

I proudly support a “balanced approach” in the context of debt reduction that grows the economy and boosts tax revenues in the process. But when presented with the option of choking our weak economy with yet another net tax increase, I will oppose it. Our country needs new taxpayers, not new taxes.

Marco expanded on these ideas in an op-ed titled “New Taxpayers, Not New Taxes”

Monday, July 11th, 2011

“We Don’t Need New Taxes. We Need New Taxpayers.”
On Wednesday, Marco joined Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) to speak on the Senate floor about jobs and the debt. In his remarks, Marco stressed the importance of taking bad job-destroying ideas off the table in ongoing debt reduction negotiations. Watch their full joint speech here. “Here’s the bottom line: These tax increases they’re talking about, these so-called revenue enhancers, they don’t solve the problem,” Rubio said. “Here is what I suggest works in a balanced approach, using the President’s terminology. Let’s stop talking about new taxes and start talking about creating new taxpayers, which basically means jobs.”

Marco expanded on these ideas in an op-ed titled “New Taxpayers, Not New Taxes” for National Review Online.

“As the ongoing debt negotiations advance, members of Congress should evaluate the components of a debt package through one question: Will this make it harder or easier for the American people to create jobs? … when presented with the option of choking our weak economy with yet another net tax increase, I will oppose it. Our country needs new taxpayers, not new taxes.”